Off the Cuff: Did the Bosman Ruling ruin football as we knew it?

levitra orosolubile 5 mg prezzo warren ausbildungsnachweis monatlich beispiel essay essay on air pollution and its prevention follow link great gatsby themes essay curcumin side effects levitra dosis maxima abilify cost increase best expository essay editor service ca example of research paper format follow link sample gp essays on education a very short essay on my best friend see url quote an essay title what cars are in viagra commercials original essay online an essay outline example legend of king arthur research paper generieke viagra prijs brandhout aufgaben kompetenz verantwortung beispiel essay nexium composition we are not perfect essay dj viagra que me voy essay for india female viagra generic columnist Ed Diggins returns for the new year with a look at the Bosman Ruling which came into effect just over 15 years ago.

When Jean-Marc Bosman walked up the steps of the European Court of Justice in late 1995, I wonder did he realise that the actions he was about to take, would play a huge part in ending football as we knew it? On the 15th December that year, loyalty in football officially died. So did the English youth football structure.

The landmark decision to allow players  in the final six months of their contract to openly negotiate deals with other clubs and leave for free when that contract expired set in motion a trend of debt, greed and selfishness that had never been witnessed in football.

Some will argue that the new ruling was the correct one for the players, as clubs effectively no longer had the right to dictate their futures by refusing to allow them to leave the club without a suitable fee. However, what about the clubs who invested their time, resources, money and trust in a player for four years and end up with nothing? Was the shift from club power to player power, such a good thing? Surely a better balance could have been found.

Within a few short months, the world transfer record that had remained unchallenged for four years was broken. A stagnant market suddenly became lithered with multi million pound deals and that record was broken every year for the next six years. Players’ wages rose to unmanageable levels with agents making six and seven figure fees for each major deal signed. It just spiralled and spiralled.

When a player signs a contract for four years they are essentially only signing a three year deal. The last year, or even in a lot of cases well before that, is spent trying to renegotiate. This puts all the power to the player, who quite often demands and obtains pay rises of obscene levels. If they decide not to sign, they can command signing on fees and even further wages increases with a new club, who get them on the cheap.

Take the recent Wayne Rooney transfer fiasco and all the conspiracy theories that came with that. While most were exactly just that, some of the root problems were steeped in Bosman consequences.  United were being forced into a corner by Rooney or as Sir Alex Ferguson suggested, agent Paul Stretford.

Rooney was at the time entering the last stages of his contract. As every potential transfer window passed, United stood to lose millions and millions on his value. The most pessimistic of United fans believe that the deal was signed just to ease the vultures gathering on Rooney and up his value again for when he does leave. A hefty pay rise makes it a win win situation for Rooney and even with his questionable form the Bosman ruling ensured he would never go hungry.

A side effect of the rule was the removal of restrictions on foreign players across Europe, again bringing consequences. On the opening day of the premiership season in 1992, only 11 non British or Irish players were in the starting line ups for all 22 clubs combined.

Ten years on from the ruling in 2005, just under 50% of the entire registered playing staff were foreign. That number is now standing just shy of 70%. More choice, more free agents. Less chance for local lads to shine, the need for instant return became greater. And the effects of this are clear now.

Look at the current plight of the English international side with high profile failure after failure in every major tournament. In the early years of the last decade, England believed they could emulate the work of the French, famed for their footballing academies.  A huge focus on youth development followed and subsequently the “90 mile rule” was introduced. Players under the age of 16 were restricted to playing for clubs only within a 90 mile radius of their home.

What has it achieved? Zilch. Despite almost £200 million worth of investment in underage football, not one of the players on show during England’s disastrous defeat to Germany in South Africa had come through this restructured system.

Instead, what it did lead to was a refocus of the big clubs on where they would concentrate their youth investment. Cesc Fàbregas and a host of other international super kids arrived at Arsenal. United, traditionally the masters of youth development, turned to the likes of Gerard Piqué, Giuseppe Rossi and Federico Macheda to bolster their ranks.

All of these players plus dozens more were offered professional contracts and arrived before their 17th birthday, something not allowed in countries like Italy and Spain but still past the age cut off for the 90 mile rule in England.

We have now seen the introduction of the home grown rule, with squads limited to 25 players over the age of 21. Eight players must be home grown. This will help to slow down the rate of foreign influx, but the damage of the past 15 years could take an age to clear.

The ruling too has been the scourge of our esteemed friends in Uefa who believe that it has directly created the gap between the so called elite clubs and the rest. They have tried to introduce measures to combat this, with their failed 6 + 5 rule being the most infamous. Every new measure has Mr Bosman standing in their way.

On the 15th December 1995, football changed for ever. 15 years and one month on, the footballing world is still reeling from the events in Luxembourg that day. Countries like France and Spain had their own programs in place since the early 1990’s but the English FA are still playing catch up. And so are the bank balances of the majority of European clubs.

You can read more of Ed’s musings by following him on Twitter.

The Author

Neil Sherwin

Co-editor of Writes mostly on Premier League and A-League with contributions to other sites including TheFootballSack, InBedWithMaradona and Bloomberg's BSports. Has featured on The Guardian's Football Weekly.

6 thoughts on “Off the Cuff: Did the Bosman Ruling ruin football as we knew it?

  1. “loyalty in football officially died”
    Thats total and absolute utter BS.
    Same can be said about year 1961.
    Loyalty is a personal trait. There are 1 club men still present in todays game across countries.

    Forcefully keeping one at work is not loyalty but slavery.
    I hope you are not longing for slavery, now are you?

    Human individual freedom is for more important that some sport,
    Football at the end of the day is an entertainment activity, Don’t forget that.

    England was already hopeless, what had they won prior to 1995?
    End of point.

    Players bring in the crowd, they bring in the merchandise, they bring in the trophies,
    Most of all they bring in the Legacy.

    and they can only do this for 15 years at max. at the cost of sacrificing their studies/normal development in their youth.

    They absolutely deserve what they get, they don’t get enough in my view.
    They are the best at what they do that our species has to offer, they are worth it.

    I hear this argument all the time of overpaid footballers,
    Football is a business, and Businesses are very cynical and sane when it comes to pay, it pays what it sees someone is worth.

    1. “Forcefully keeping one at work is not loyalty but slavery.
      I hope you are not longing for slavery, now are you?”

      That’s a hyperbole if i ever saw one.

  2. I thought it was an excellent article Ed.
    Alas, Varun does have a point about players being mistreated by clubs. In my country, Scotland ,
    Jim McLean at Dundee United was one who, it is alleged , exploited the system to keep players at the club. I believe there is a form of compensation system for players under a certain age.
    That said football is different to normal employment where people can move freely from job to job, or at least it should be !

    1. Articles here on BPF are great. No prob for me in that aspect.

      I don’t see how football is different from normal employment, it is just like any other.
      Just because people follow with interest those employees doesn’t change anything.

      Clubs are more at fault for paying beyond their means (those that do),
      Thats just bad business practice,
      There should be no sympathy (for the clubs) and player-bashing because the clubs got their act wrong.

  3. This man has totally ruined professional football as we know it. I hope he can live with the consequences of his actions. If only he could have accepted things as they were and shut up, football would be a far better game today if he had.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *