Liverpool v Spurs: who will be left holding the poisoned chalice?

Follow BPF on Twitter for more Liverpool v Spurs coverage.

I had originally entitled this article “The race for 6th”, not due to my ignorance of the qualification process for Europe nor because I truly believe that either team is actively seeking 6th spot – Liverpool’s recent form is testament to that – but because it does raise the question of whether either manager or team for that matter would really be happy with 5th place and the Europa League responsibilities it brings with it.

Liverpool endured a torrid and frustrating European season this term and once knocked out appeared glad to see the back of it – as the fantastic run of performances and results since prove. For Spurs – they did experience the sweet taste of Champions League football but Tuesday night’s result means that they won’t be eating at Europe’s head table for at least another season. I imagine they may find it hard to endure trips to 10,000-seater stadiums in the outer reaches of Europe, and one would imagine Rafael van der Vaart and co. might find that a little hard to swallow. So what should they do? I am not suggesting they carefully throw their remaining games to ensure they do not have the inconvenience of European football; it just seems like a peculiar situation.

I have spoken to Liverpool fans who have rightly said they want their team to finish as high as possible and no team should ever let it creep into their minds that to lose might be more beneficial in the long run, what sort of attitude and state of mind would that breed? I may also be completely wrong in my assertions that these teams would like to avoid Europe or that this route would also be beneficial, so let’s examine the pros and cons as they relate to each team.

Liverpool have had new life breathed into them under Kenny Dalglish, and I imagine having learnt from an unconvincing journey this season and with a reinforced fully fit and fully eligible (Suarez was cup tied) squad they would probably fancy their chances of winning the trophy, and many (including myself) believe that only victory would ultimately be deemed as success in this competition for Liverpool. Furthermore, a 6th place finish in the league may put off potential transfer targets who want European football, as well as domestic success. It may be difficult to convince a player who has not followed Dalglish’s revolution first hand that they really will be up there challenging next season and so European football could be the sweetener. They will also be encouraged by the fact that Suarez joined them when they were flirting with the relegation zone in January, and looked destined for a mid-table finish at best. The only issue I can see with this is that the top category of players will want Champions League football. There is no way van der Vaart would have gone to Spurs if they had not qualified for Europe’s most prestigious competition.

Should Liverpool invest heavily in the summer as is expected and bring in five or six new faces, the extra games may give Kenny the opportunity to rotate the squad keeping players sharp and more importantly happy, while also continuing the development of some of the youngsters who have been outstanding recently. Of course the flip side of this is that in the latter stages the competition has the potential to become the poisoned chalice that many fear. Next season Liverpool will be looking for a minimum of Champions League qualification and therefore will have to overhaul, one suspects, Spurs, the cash happy Manchester City and maybe even battle with Everton, if they are to manage to get their pre-season in order once and for all. This means that come March/April time extra games are not welcomed and are also not the type you can send out the kids or squad players to “do a job”. This is when it could really hurt them.

For Spurs, it may be easier to handle the strains of the Europa League. They have a large squad and Harry will probably add to that should they qualify. I also believe that Harry is ruthless enough to ditch the Europa and play a second string if it means qualifying for the riches of the Champions League, however I think Liverpool have perhaps a little more respect for Europe and I am not sure would treat the competition with contempt.

Why it will really hurt Harry is that Spurs had caught the pack, they had “made it”, they were part of Europe’s elite, theoretically one of the “Big 4”, thumping Inter Milan, beating AC Milan, only to be brought back down to earth with a 4-2 defeat to Bolton and a 3-1 defeat to Blackpool, respectively. Manchester City’s money, and you suspect Liverpool’s new age, has seen them slip down the pecking order. So what now? They don’t have the pull Liverpool do to bring in any big names without European football, one would suspect. I feel out of the two clubs Europa football suits Spurs more. They can pick up some decent players and Harry can work his magic to get them playing like world beaters. The extra money can help them have a charge at the big boys again, but finish 6th and I think they may just slip further behind – as I am not sure they can realistically finish top four next season without major investment, and if the rumours about some of their stars leaving are to be believed next season could be a year of transition for the North London club.

If we are to assume that these two teams have top four ambitions next season and maybe even fancy themselves as outsiders for the Premier League crown, then whoever finishes 6th will have a massive advantage over the other five, that’s for sure.

8 thoughts on “Liverpool v Spurs: who will be left holding the poisoned chalice?

  1. All this talk around of teams not wanting to be in the Europa league is stuff and nonsense. Most of these writers are also the same who insist that a sign of success is the number of trophies and cups a team wins. That being so the Europa cup IS a trophy and I am sure any winning team would be proud of it!
    If then it is not important then can we expect these people to admit that the number of cups a team hold is completely immaterial to their success? – I don’t think so somehow!!

  2. As a Spurs exile on Merseyside since 1974 I’ll just be happy if we give it a real go. Spurs have only won seven times at Anfield since 1910 and although I was pleasantly surprised in 1998 (you could hear a pin drop!) it seems usually a case of just going through the motions before getting back on the bus as soon as possible.
    Some of the more ‘recent’ victories even needed the help of the likes of Sheringham and Klinsmann, strikers of a calibre we currently don’t have. But though we couldn’t punch our way out of a paper bag at present I hope we don’t have the usual roll-over. Fight, lads, fight, and as for where we finish up who cares.

  3. Blindside. I see what you are saying, a trophy is still a trophy, but many big teams wouldnt want to win it because only teams who arent good enough to get in CL or are knocked out of CL can enter it. Let me ask you this, if your were able to enter the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy or FA Vase, would you? It is a trophy after all…. Are we to suggest that Whitley Town are a more successful team than say West Ham because they have won more trophies? I completely understand if you think that it is a positive to be in the UEFA and my article is just arguing a little more strongly towards avoiding it. My main argument is that for both teams CL football is so important for long term success that unless the win the UEFA cup it will overall be a negative experience.

  4. I can’t see Spurs winning this one. Their form over the last 3 months is so bad, they compete with Arsenal for the title of biggest bottlers. One win since they beat AC Milan in the middle of February isn’t european challenger form.

  5. As a Liverpool form, if I had the choice between a very good league run or a good Europa League run and a decent league run I’d choose the former. But I have no problem with them going for it, the club has always had this “have to be in Europe” mentality and it’ll be a good stepping stone for CL football. Also, not many players would snort at the chance to join Liverpool – considering the second half of this season, plus some action on the continent.

    I also like the opportunity this gives to blood young players, I’d expect Dalglish to use these games as a chance to integrate young players and the senior players into the life of travelling abroad and playing against obscure opponents in obscure places.

  6. Roy Hodgson made it clear his priority was the league, but when Gerrard came on against Napoli he showed that players and fans want to win matches and do well in European competition.

    I think Kenny Dalglish said it was not his decision to decide the ambition of the club and they lost in the end to a hard working Braga side who are now in the final.

    It’s a great competition for clubs to prove they are able to succeed in Europe, examples from recent years include Porto, Atletico Madrid, Shakhtar. I bet there are frustrated Villa and Everton fans who wished their club had a good run in it.

    i think as you say that as Redknapp has had the taste of CL elitism, he will now decide that Tottenham are too good for it and it is too much hassle. That is, unless, Spurs have a good run in it.

  7. I definitely agree with Kevin Coleman’s assertion that the Europa League gives a chance to blood young players. Not only that, it also gives important tournament experience to all involved. A season spent handling the pressures of the Europa League could surely be invaluable preparation for the headier climes of the Champions League.

    I think you’re right to suggest that Europa League football could help Spurs attract the one or two extra players they need to help consolidate themselves as perennial contenders for the Champions League spots. It may also be crucial to their plans to keep the likes of Modric and Bale.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *