Yet the heralding of a new era was not to come, at least not under him. AVB’s reign was abruptly – crushingly – stopped in its tracks. Roman paused, looked and re-routed. He refused to make a rash decision by bringing someone new in. Instead, a “Still Quite Young One” was drafted in temporarily.
Off the field, Roman and his posse of men can chart more carefully, meticulously going over every candidate, hopefully ones that can stay in the job for longer than five minutes. But on the field, one man is putting a massive case ahead for the permanent vacancy: Roberto Di Matteo. A man, whose previous managerial highlight would have been the dizzy heights of the Black Country derby. A man, who boasts no managerial silverware, is the same man who has guided Chelsea thus far to three wins out of three, as well as FA Cup and Champions League quarter-finals. The same man that has won as many matches as his predecessor in his last twelve league matches. What is Di Matteo doing that AVB, who won everything imaginable at Porto, could not?
Wednesday night, 3-1 down from the first leg, yet still managing to prevail, summed up RDM’s influence. The entire world witnessed something completely different, unseen in the AVB regime. Chelsea were cautious yet calculated. They played with fear but without pressure. Expectation was low, confidence was instilled. That was down to one man: Di Matteo. The 41-year-old stripped back Chelsea to the basics. Everything was kept simple. This wasn’t “massive overhaul” time, merely “save our season” time. The unity was immense. They were all in it together. And the result showed. Even Italian newspapers bowed down, bearing the headline: “Thanks Napoli. You tried. Chelsea were too strong.”
Pre-match, Di Matteo refused to lie. He did not go round the point. He was not bogged down in intricate detail, using fancy terminology, a characteristic of Villas-Boas. He laid it bare; it wasn’t just the biggest challenge of his footballing career, it was “the biggest challenge of my life.” He was prepared to confront the bleak reality of Chelsea’s season, and tackle it. He was not in a false sense of optimism. He was not vain. He rallied his players. He summoned up some old-school Chelsea fight. And he saw Chelsea through.
Line-ups have been tellingly different from that of AVB. For a partnership that lasted eight months, RDM clearly did not pick up any points from AVB. And rightly so. Lots claim the first-leg Napoli defeat sparked the beginning of the end for AVB. Abramovich demanded to know why Cole, Lampard and Essien did not start. He arrogantly tried to faze out the old guard. It was a “I’m boss and I don’t care how big the match is, you obey” statement. And how they have made him to look like a fool now. Roberto was smart. He knew he could rely on his big-game players. Golden-oldies in Terry, Lampard and Drogba all scored. AVB underestimated not just the power of the trio, but the importance of them. For a man in the Chelsea seat, he ought to have taken a look at his opponent’s philosophy. Sir Alex Ferguson has not only managed to keep Scholes and Giggs fit, but kept them consistently good. He will not play them every match, knowing the fatigue of years of continued service. But he will always call on them for the big matches. AVB thought contrary, but paid a hefty price. Di Matteo did not, and reaped the rewards.
The tactics in the matches post-AVB have been unconventional, especially against Napoli. But Roberto is a clever man. The likes of Lampard and Ramires were in unfamiliar positions, yet both were up to the occasion, stuffing out the Three Tenors: Lavezzi, Hamsik and Cavani.
The substitutes too were astute and meaningful. Torres was brought on to give their defenders another out-and-out striker to think about, and was lively throughout.
Malouda was disciplined when Mata was tiring and found space hard to come by in a tight Napoli midfield. The Frenchmen, heavily criticised of late, nullified Napoli’s tremendous threat from wide, stopping Maggio counter-attacking. Bosingwa on for Terry was unconventional yet effective too.
Ivanovic, though a tremendous right-back, is a natural centre-back, so it made sense to draft him inside to see out the final moments. Bosingwa could also halt the progression of Napoli’s wide forwards, who are at their best when stretching the pitch and running off the ball into space. It was a deliberate ploy to make it tight, and it worked.
The passion was back in full force. Chelsea had not played a better match than that for some time. They were pumped up, an amazing change from lethargic matches seen under AVB. Where AVB tended to overcomplicate, looking into every aspect of football to microscopic detail, RDM sought to simplify. This was no time for revolution or evolution. This was about making full use of what he had.
The humility is striking: “I am just focused on trying to win games and trying to get the best out of the players… What happens after is not important.” He turned into the galvaniser, more sports psychologist than tactical manager, more communication than discipline. He stripped Chelsea back to their dogged determination, went back to basics, and found a compromise between attack and defence.
But crucially, he respected his warriors. He talked to everyone individually to start, to sort out any issues. He raised morale. He man-managed soundly. He has true passion for the club which did so much for him, and the love will have come across in the dressing rooms. The players were proud to wear the shirt. They fought and fought – and eventually conquered.
Roberto Di Matteo, for whatever the summer brings, has made a mark where AVB could not. Chelsea are only the third English club to lose a European Cup first-leg tie by two or more goals and still progress. Perserverance, determination and tenacity has been restored. That match, will live long in the memory. Roberto Di Matteo, for all he won as a player, has written another chapter in Chelsea history.