<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking Points: South Africa 0-3 Uruguay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backpagefootball.com/talking-points-south-africa-0-3-uruguay/6716/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backpagefootball.com/talking-points-south-africa-0-3-uruguay/6716/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: African Nations at the World Cup &#8211; a failure? &#8211; Back Page Football</title>
		<link>http://backpagefootball.com/talking-points-south-africa-0-3-uruguay/6716/comment-page-1/#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator>African Nations at the World Cup &#8211; a failure? &#8211; Back Page Football</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 10:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpagefootball.com/?p=6716#comment-7983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] spark needed to be a truly imposing threat and the willing running of Mphela was not enough to overcome the Uruguayans. A final group game victory over the troubled French flattered to deceive as Parreira’s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spark needed to be a truly imposing threat and the willing running of Mphela was not enough to overcome the Uruguayans. A final group game victory over the troubled French flattered to deceive as Parreira’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Sherwin</title>
		<link>http://backpagefootball.com/talking-points-south-africa-0-3-uruguay/6716/comment-page-1/#comment-7248</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Sherwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpagefootball.com/?p=6716#comment-7248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thata boy Diego. My 75/1 shot for top scorer is now....top scorer!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thata boy Diego. My 75/1 shot for top scorer is now&#8230;.top scorer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Parker</title>
		<link>http://backpagefootball.com/talking-points-south-africa-0-3-uruguay/6716/comment-page-1/#comment-7246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpagefootball.com/?p=6716#comment-7246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good analysis. 

South Africa were very disappointing tonight, completely lacking any incisive passing and failing to show attacking awareness. They actually started to pass the ball around better after the sending off.

I would take issue with Forlan&#039;s goal being &#039;stunning&#039; though. If a shot is deflected (and it was still a significant deflection) can the striker still be credited?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis. </p>
<p>South Africa were very disappointing tonight, completely lacking any incisive passing and failing to show attacking awareness. They actually started to pass the ball around better after the sending off.</p>
<p>I would take issue with Forlan&#8217;s goal being &#8216;stunning&#8217; though. If a shot is deflected (and it was still a significant deflection) can the striker still be credited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
