Talkin’ bout a Rafalution

by Back Page Football

After a disappointing season, Liverpool face a tricky summer ahead, particularly on the transfer front and Conan Doherty takes a look at Rafa’s record since he took over at the Anfield club.

‘Rafael Benitez has performed well in the transfer market.’

If by “well” you actually mean “disgracefully”.

I remember one particular Red saying something just as embarrassing in 1995, “you’ll never win anything with kids”. To say Rafael Benitez has performed well in the transfer market is surely as controversially flawed and it should never be lived down.

And because Benitez loves his facts, let’s then have a look at the facts:

  • Rafael Benitez’ net expenditure at Liverpool after the summer transfer market in 2009 was a whopping £95.8 million … FACT
  • Each year, the Spanish jester has had £19.16m available to spend on wasted transfers – the same price Martin O’Neill acquired both Ashley Young and James Milner for … FACT
  • Of Benitez’ first 21 signings, only three have survived to this very day … FACT
  • After the Steven Gerrard-inspired Istanbul comeback, Benitez proclaimed, “We’re putting Gerrard on a special weights programme for his shoulders because we are planning on him lifting loads of trophies” – Five seasons and one FA Cup later, the Madrid born manager is therefore a self-proclaimed failure … FACT

Before I continue deciphering the appalling performance of Benitez in both the transfer market and in his general feats, I think it’s important that I make it clear that I am an Aston Villa fan and have no bias whatsoever against the Liverpool club or any of their staff. What I do have partiality with, is when someone takes over a giant club performing consistently at a high standard, and serves only to bring mediocrity and disrepute to its proud reputation. Not only this, but the underperforming gaffer seems immune to any form of criticism about any angle of his policies and results by all Scouse fans.

When Benitez  first took over the helm at Anfield in the 2004-05 season, I forgave his somewhat questionable first signings. An influx of Spanish strangers spelled danger ahead for the mighty reds, but I defended the manager – understanding that these were the players he trusted and was familiar with. Despite the fact that his first crack at the transfer market demonstrated nothing but the ability to find unexciting foreigners with little potential and zero use, the Champions League victory allowed very glamorous wallpaper to be applied over the all too apparent cracks.

On top of this, having inherited a competent first XI, passed on by the mercurial Gerard Houliér (who didn’t get the chance to play his big money signing, Cisse), Benitez won trophies only before he was allowed to fully put his stamp on the team (Champions League ’05; FA Cup ’06). In FACT, out of the 14 players used in Istanbul, just two of them were recruited by Benitez himself. Can I deny how well he set them up to get as far they did? Definitely not. Can Liverpool fans deny that their fifth European Cup was brought home by Houliér’s players? I don’t think so. And does this make a case that “Rafa’s” transfer dealings are sub standard? Most certainly.

The obvious pitch based results over the past six seasons have also suggested a consistent failure to understand the English Premier League (a competition which the Merseyside faithful so desperately want to conquer, and one which they so richly deserve). With the exception of last season, Liverpool have remained an uninspired, unenthusiastic threat who promised zilch signs of an assault on the coveted domestic prize. Moreover, even their second place finish was marred with apathetic results which suggested that they wre never really title contenders in the first place. Rafa Benitez’s uber defensive style proved, in the end, a two-edged sword. With an eventual improvement in their dreadful away form of previous seasons, Liverpool failed to capitalise with their negative approach destroying any chance of turning teams over in front of a hair-raising Kop. Seven tied games on Anfield Road showed the ineffectiveness of the system when they came up against teams who were equally as prepared to protect their goal. Indeed it was only towards the tail end of the season when Liverpool opened up did they make use of having the two best players in the world and dismantled opponents with ruthless massacres. However, it proved too little too late and for this, I hold the manager responsible.

In 2010, the five time European Champions sit seventh in the Barclays Premier League, eliminated in the Champions League group stages, not even a League Cup challenge to boast and tripped up in the FA Cup Third Round. For this too, I hold the manager responsible. In your sixth season, you have had more than enough time to imprint your stamp on your team. In your sixth season, you have had adequate time to develop an understanding of the competitions in which you are performing. After 96 million, you have had more than enough pounds to improve an inherited gold mine. After 96 million, you have had more than enough pounds to cope with injuries in the squad you have voluntarily built.

This is why I grind my teeth together when I hear complaints aimed at the American owners. It is because of their inadequacies that Benitez is devoid of censure. The “facts” are simply that the Spaniard took over a vibrant club with a solid base of capable players and has had almost £100 million to spend how he wished. Instead of complaining about “Rafa not having enough funds”, maybe Reds fans should be complaining about the waste of £7m hastily dished out to obtain the limited services of Andrea Dossenna (was Babel around £9m?). Maybe Scousers should bemoan the money spent to turn Dirk Kuyt into a glorified right back. Maybe Liverpool supporters should instead begrudge the fact that Benitez has had to sell on the majority of his signings, not because of the board, but because of his failure to find the right players in the first place. The fans explain that the teams of the past were blessed with dead wood such as Djimi Traore, Igor Biscan and Vladimir Smicer: Six years later, are they really much better off with the likes of Insua, Lucas or El Zhar?

Or am I being too harsh? After all, it was Benitez who brought Fernando Torres to the Premier League: and for this, I am eternally thankful. It was Benitez who resurrected the West Ham reject, Mascherano’s career in monstrous proportions. He found Daniel Agger and no doubt a top class Goalkeeper. Although, despite his obvious effect, I think he paid over the odds for Glen Johnson – but such is today’s market and the inflation of English players. And Liverpool progressed to the Europa League Semi-Finals (a competition which even little old Aston Villa undermined in two successive years by fielding weakened sides; and a competition in which midtable Fulham find themselves amongst the last 2 standing).

But it is because of their super-strong spine that I feel I have to question the manager’s further judgement. Liverpool have consistently found themselves in the top four bracket as one of the highest paid clubs (along with Spurs, United and Chelsea – until City came along this Summer). Arsenal, who have comfortably secured Champions League qualification every year without fail under Arsene Wenger, are probably nowhere near that list. I dare to think what Martin O’Neill and David Moyes could do with £100m to spend on a team that already boasted the likes of Jamie Carragher, Sami Hyypia, Dietmar Hamaan and Steven Gerrard – a squad which Benitez, to his credit, proved could be champions of Europe. Yes, he has had to reluctantly sell on players in certain cases to increase the transfer kitty, but the disappearance into oblivion of the extremely vast majority of his signings is testament to the unforgiveable contemplation that they were good enough for Liverpool in the first place. And speaking to obstinate Reds fans on Merseyside, the rest of the players he has had to bring in are apparently “good players”.

Liverpool fans will relentlessly defend the likes of current squad members Kyrgiakos, Skrtel, Insua, Lucas, Kuyt, Babel, N’Gog et al. If these players are in fact all that they are made out to be, then Liverpool should have a heck of a squad. With apparently 15 “quality” squad players, what is the problem? How can Liverpool underperform if they are blessed with such “talent”? The answer is simple:, either these players (these signings) are not all they are made out to be; or Benitez is doing a poor job away from the transfer market. (And I don’t believe the latter. How can I? He got such a poor squad to second in the league last year!)

So I beg to be answered: What has happened to the great “Rafalution”? Somewhere in their stubbornness, Liverpool fans have forgotten all that they stood for and even all that they were promised. Not because of members in the board room, but because their manager has spent the guts of a century of cash on players who would never in the wildest of dreams have taken the club forward. Is Liverpool Football Club really better off with Rafa Benitez? When I look at their squad right now, I can think of 96 million reasons why they are not.

However, speaking as a non-Liverpool fan: long live the king. I hope that the embarrassing portrait on the flag entitled “In Rafa We Trust” keeps flying high at Anfield. Because as long as Benitez is in charge, Aston Villa are catching up.

Rafa’s Duds

Carson

Josemi     Kyrgiakos     Skrtel     Dossena

Lucas     Sissoko

Antonio Nunez      Voronin       Ryan Babel

Morientes

Subs: Itandje, Degan, Plessis, Gonzalez, Pennant, El Zhar, Fowler

14 Responses

  1. Kevin Coleman Kevin Coleman says:

    Surprised this got published.

    I want this man to go do the same with Martin O Neill’s facts and figures in the transfer market before he puts the Villa boss in a bracket ahead of Rafa as a transfer dealer.

    And I LOL at that final “fact” RE Gerrard and weights, petty, something you wouldn’t see in a tabloid, and something stupid I wouldn’t expect in an opinion post like this on BPF.

  2. Anon says:

    Talking of facts, http://astonvillacentral.com/mon-xfrs/.

    O’Neill has spent more (net) in 4 years than Rafa has in 6.

    In the same time, Liverpool’s net spend was £43m whereas Villa’s was £84m. But don’t let that get in the way of your article.

  3. Aaron says:

    Clueless.

  4. Matthew Wood says:

    Terrible, misinformed piece.

    I find it slightly hilaroius that Kyriagkos, Lucas, Skrtel and Sissoko make your ‘dud’ team when clearly none of them were/are bad signings.

    Go read this and educate yourself;
    http://tomkinstimes.com/2010/04/transfer-tosh/

  5. Eamonn Power Eamonn Power says:

    Firstly , as a United fan I’m never sad to see Liverpool being in the mire but I’m afraid I have to agree with Matt and Kevin and the others on this.

    While Benitez most certainly has his shortcomings as a manger, I feel that some of the hype surrounding him of late has become far too much. I do believe that he cannot bring Liverpool any further and should step down but people should not denigrate the success he has managed to achieve before now. Especially since his predecessor Houllier, was anything but “mercurial” as you described him.

    A lot of this piece is extremely misinformed. Whatever about Lucas (jury is still out, not as bad as some people make out but not as under rated as others claim either), labeling Kyrgiakos and Skrtel “duds” is completely unjustified and symptomatic as to how Benitez has been subjected to all sorts of wild criticism recently. While some of his transfers (okay, a lot) have not worked out there has been many that have been successful.

    Furthermore, Liverpool’s wage bills are lower than Arsenals, aswell as Chelsea’s, United’s and City’s. To say that Arsenal “probably” spend less was poor.

    Also, Javier Mascherano a “West Ham “eject”. Are you serious? The next time West Ham make £19m off a “reject” Freddie Sears will be Trevor Brookings age.

  6. Conall says:

    Shockin, sensationalist, cliche ridden stuff dear friend. The test data for all of your “FACTS” is ridiculously selective and specific, particuarly the quote…what do you expect a manager to say like? Petty and pedantic.

    “Each year, the Spanish jester has had £19.16m available to spend on wasted transfers – the same price Martin O’Neill acquired both Ashley Young and James Milner for … FACT”

    19.16 million per year is peanuts for a top 4 club, especially considering out of the top 4 Liverpool were by far the weakest and are also in a shocking financial state.

    Also, what does comparing that amount to two O’Neill signings prove? Absolutely nothing. It’s anecdotal at best. Equally true could be this statement:

    Liverpool have 19 million to spend per summer….2/3rd of what Sir Alex spent on Berbatov

    That doesn’t make 19 million all of a sudden a small amount, nor does it make sir alex a terrible manager in the transfer market. It’s simply shows that 19 million can be construed any which way to show any point that any hack journalist wishes to show for any given cheap point. A largely unsubstantiated point devoid of any balance whatsover and littered with bias at that.

    You somehow forgot these two facts?

    Rafa Benitez has performed better in the league than any other manager we’ve ever had since the Premier League’s inception. FACT

    Rafa Benitez has performed better than any other manager we’ve ever had in the Champions League since its inception. FACT

    And I don’t just mean one off seasons like when we won the thing, Houllier didn’t qualify for the CL every year like Rafa has every season (until this year), and also we generally get through to the latter stages of the qualification (until this year).

    If i’m not mistaken, a couple years ago Liverpool were second only to Milan in the UEFA co-efficient rankings table?

    A means based, time spanning, unbiased statistic for you there. Persuasive isn’t it?

    This season marks the first time where Rafa can be rightfully criticised, it’s been a shocking season to be fair – our league finish also ensures that next season will undoubtedely be a bad one as well. However prior to this season I think Rafa’s record speaks for itself…if you look at his record as a whole and don’t single out individual misleading parts. He is an excellent manager and in the absence of stable, financially sound ownership I’d much rather have him than Roy Hodgson because not all fans are as fickle as the narrative of this article.

  7. Just a quick thought on each comment:

    – Kevin, I have scrutinized O’Neill’s record on my blog site. It looks pretty impressive

    – Anon, I’m sorry but Martin O’Neill has not spent more (net) in 4 years than Rafa has in 6

    – Matthew, i’m actually already a keen follower of Paul Tomkins’ work

    – Eamonn, I’ll make a correction then: Arsenal “definitely” spend less. And Liverpool still accumulate the 4th highest revenue in the league, £100m more than Villa (who finished above them) do

    – Conall, the £19m was a reference to what could have been bought each year.

    The article is not an attack at Benitez, it is a critique of his transfer performance.
    I appreciate the comments

  8. Anon says:

    Wrong again. Liverpool’s net spend in 6 years = £78,340,000 therefore my earlier post is in fact correct despite you dismissing it without supporting your reason for doing so. Martin O’Neill has in fact spent more (net) in 4 years than Rafael Benitez has in 6.

    Source:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/liverpool/7675751/Rafael-Benitezs-transfer-dealings-during-his-six-year-reign-at-Liverpool.html

    Peace.

  9. I shouldn’t need to back this up but:

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iAdTpAzQ0MU/SyjZGblTGcI/AAAAAAAABXM/rAFmVtmBzD0/s1600-h/Benitez+NET+SPEND.png

    And as Matthew would tell you, Paul Tomkins is constantly quoted confirming that Rafa’s net spend is “over £90m”…

  10. Anon says:

    Whilst I respect your views, the link is 2004-2009 whereas the Daily Telegraph link was published about 2 weeks ago and is 2004-2010 so it is difficult to compare the two. The latest figures show that his net spend is £78.4m.

    I wish you well.

  11. Yep, they were released after the summer transfer market (as mentioned in my article).
    But unless someone I’m forgetting was sold in January for £17.4m, these figures should still hold water

  12. Eamonn Power Eamonn Power says:

    Conan, my comment wasn’t about your use of the word “probably”, it was more related to the fact that the point you were making was completely wrong.

    Your use of the word “probably” just went to show how little effort you put into making it, so before you make that correction you mentioned you might want to read this first:

    http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/david-maddock/For-all-Rafa-Benitez-s-moaning-about-money-only-a-new-stadium-will-allow-Liverpool-to-win-the-Premier-League-title-The-David-Maddock-Column-article309305.html

    where you’ll see- “where do Liverpool stand in wage spending? Currently, they are fourth, with an annual spend of just over £110million on wages. Arsenal are third at around £130million, Manchester United second with £160million annual wage spend, and Chelsea top with a spend of £180million”

    actually a very interesting article relating success not with total transfer spends but with wage bills, also covers a few of the other points people are debating here

  13. Orla Gordon says:

    How can you judge a manager and his signings on one season? You never would have written this piece a year ago when Liverpool finished second in the league with a points total which would have won them the title the previous year.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply