<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo of the Week #3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backpagefootball.com/issue-three/1299/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backpagefootball.com/issue-three/1299/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:24:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Walsh</title>
		<link>http://backpagefootball.com/issue-three/1299/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpagefootball.com/?p=1299#comment-267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing I see under it is an unintrusive &quot;Photo from Fotoglif&quot; 
I presume there must be something else but I can&#039;t see it with adblock. So I would definitely vote for this option.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I see under it is an unintrusive &#8220;Photo from Fotoglif&#8221;<br />
I presume there must be something else but I can&#8217;t see it with adblock. So I would definitely vote for this option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Coleman</title>
		<link>http://backpagefootball.com/issue-three/1299/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpagefootball.com/?p=1299#comment-254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fotoglif win on quality and images. PicApp don&#039;t stock EPL images from every game, while Glif do. Huge pity about the advert.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fotoglif win on quality and images. PicApp don&#8217;t stock EPL images from every game, while Glif do. Huge pity about the advert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazysportsfan</title>
		<link>http://backpagefootball.com/issue-three/1299/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>lazysportsfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpagefootball.com/?p=1299#comment-253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If quality is significantly better, i&#039;d say go for it.
Doesn&#039;t bother me personally, but can see how it would]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If quality is significantly better, i&#8217;d say go for it.<br />
Doesn&#8217;t bother me personally, but can see how it would</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
